I’ve chosen two articles on the
end of the shutdown of the American government: the first from MSNBC, and the
second from Fox News (for those of you who are unfamiliar with American news
giants, MSNBC is largely considered to slant news to depict Democrats
favourably, whereas Fox does the same for Republicans).
Both articles generally relay the
same information and use the same sources. Both laud the end of the shutdown,
and disapprove of the congressional gridlock, which allowed this long-standing
debate to ever reach the point of a shutdown. The key difference between the
two is the general tone in which the articles are written: the MSNBC article is
much more optimistic and upbeat about the future, quoting Obama saying: “We’ll
bounce back from this. We always do,” nodding to America’s stereotypical image
as the strongest, most resilient country. They continue painting the agreement
in a positive light, quoting a senator saying: “We believe there is common
ground (between the Democrats and the Republicans),” which is an interesting
angle to take, considering that this agreement only funds the government until
January of next year, with the debating on the most polarizing issue,
healthcare, arguably the cause of the gridlock, postponed until then. Finally,
MSNBC underlines how the shutdown has sent the public’s opinion of the
Republican Party “plummeting,” according to recent polls.
Fox News’ article is much more
grim, opening by qualifying the agreement as Obama’s “virtually condition-free
increase in the debt ceiling,” which alludes to the popular American
right-winger opinion that Democrats are careless spenders. They go on to call
Obama’s healthcare law “unpopular,” and to further highlight that this
agreement is not a proper solution because it only delays the resolution to the
gridlock by a few more months. Finally, they say: “Obama got what he wanted,”
which gives the reader the impression that the bad guy has won, whilst the Republicans
"(…) fought the good fight.” Fox makes it abundantly clear that they are
not supporters of the Democratic Party; in fact they view them quite
unfavourably, a long-known fact to Americans (and to anyone who reads this
article). Unsurprisingly, Fox makes no mention of the spiralling public opinion
of the Republican Party.
These articles did not shape my
opinion on the agreement to end the shutdown, however I wouldn’t doubt that
they could sway the opinion of somebody who does not closely follow politics,
or help solidify the position of someone who lets their political ideology cloud
their view of political happenings. They are great examples of how media
outlets can spin stories by putting emphasis on different elements of the story
or using quotes in different contexts, as they both used the same sources and
conveyed the same general information, all the while portraying the agreement
in completely different lights, in accordance with their political views. This
is why as an American I have learned to get my news from more balanced or
international outlets, such as NPR or the BBC.
Colin Woodford
MSNBC article: http://www.nbcnews.com/id/53304197/ns/local_news-portsmouth_va/t/shutdown-over-obama-surveys-damage/#.UmHLNRZU5O4
Fox News article: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/10/17/senate-begins-vote-on-budget-bill-boehner-pledges-house-wont-block-it/
This is a nicely nuanced analysis - well done! I think you are right to point to the amount of knowledge that people have about the issues as affecting how influenced they are by the news media (along with social class, education, upbringing, and other personal experience), though some evidence (which we'll come back to in week 9) suggests that those most interested in politics are most likely to choose the outlets that confirm their existing views rather than seeking balance... If I'm honest, if I wasn't engaged in research in the area, I would probably do the same!
ReplyDelete