I have chosen the recent actions of a
California-based punk band Get Crushed! who decided to film a porno on the lawn
of Westboro Baptist Church in Topeka, Kansas.
What at first was supposed to be a lesbian orgy ended up
having the band’s bassist Laura Lush lie down on the grass and masturbate while
her bandmates filmed her.
As a highly controversial topic I expected to find numerous
articles that would speak of the actions in a very bad light, however not many
media and news outlets covered the topic.
Quite a few pages said what the band had done was wrong, but
since everyone hates Westboro Baptist Church it’s alright.
However, thedailyedge.ie and socialnewsdaily.com shine a bad
light on the band rather than the church. Claire Murrihy, who is the author of
the article posted on thedailyedge.ie, states that what has occurred is a way
for a sleazy band to make their point. Thesocialnewsdaily.com call it just the
band’s way to get some attention. “There are plenty of ways to get publicity
for your band.” is the phrase that the article starts with. Both these news
stories are similar, they do not approve of the actions of the band but neither
are they too critical of the actions. Both articles are similarly structured,
they include screenshots from Twitter of what the band and Fred Phelps
(supposedly, it has not been confirmed that it is a legitimate account) tweeted
to one another and a quote from Laura Lush saying: “The Phelps family and
Westboro Baptist Church are ridiculous and do nothing except spread hate and
cause controversy. As a bisexual woman and the bass player of a ridiculous punk
band, I wanted to spread my legs and cause controversy”
An article that can be seen to favour the band would be the
news story and interview with the band frontman J.P.Hunter in Vice Magazine. It
starts with the porno being described as the brainchild of the bassist and
‘star’ of the film Laura Lush. Jak Hutchcraft the author of the article also
goes on to say: “As you probably know, the WBC are almost hilariously terrible
people, caricatures of evil layering irony upon themselves by claiming to be
doing God's work. They hate anyone who has a lifestyle choice that differs from
their own, run websites like GodHatesFags, and picket funerals of people they
don't like.” The author is clearly taking a stand against the church. Even the
questions asked in the interview can be seen as having a laugh at the topic,
for example: “Did Laura find it hard to climax under the judgmental eyes of
God?”
I would relate my opinion on the topic most to Vice
magazine. It did not make me supportive of the band’s actions, however it did
shape my opinion on the church. I find it very surprising that there were no
articles that were completely against the band’s actions.
http://www.dailyedge.ie/punk-band-get-shot-shoot-porn-1118326-Oct2013/
http://www.socialnewsdaily.com/17503/westboro-baptist-fingerbang-punk-band-films-porn-on-churchs-lawn/
http://noisey.vice.com/en_uk/blog/we-interviewed-the-band-that-shot-a-porno-outside-the-westboro-baptist-church
Leana Loide
http://noisey.vice.com/en_uk/blog/we-interviewed-the-band-that-shot-a-porno-outside-the-westboro-baptist-church
Leana Loide
Wow. I can't believe I missed this story! I share your surprise that this didn't attract more negative attention, and agree that the general distaste for the Westbro Baptist Church and their own controversial protest-cum-publicity stunts is a likely factor. Did the unsympathetic target make for an inadequate victim? Without a victim to defend is it insufficiently outrageous to attract mainstream coverage? This points to the ambiguous contemporary media attitude to protest repertoires that use spectacle and controversy tactically. Where protest is deemed legitimate it struggles to gain attention, but tactics that are successful in gaining attention are covered in delegitimising terms.
ReplyDeleteThe question is, is this an appropriate example for me to use in the protest lecture??